Opinion Please Brothers And Sisters

[DarkHalf]

Erm i just made this site, what do ya's think?

http://website.lineone.net/~wptfcmag

------------------
Locis is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.

[Seamus]

I don't know much about TFC but I have to admit that your site is very catchy. Although it took me a couple of minutes to load it up (slow modem - not your fault) it has a good layout and has some good info.

The only thing I would change (although it looks ok) is the colour of the lettering from the amber on black to something a little bit brighter so it isn't as hard to read. But as I said you can still read it so you can ignore that last comment if you wish.

Not a bad site and it does look promising.

Good Luck mate

Seamus

------------------
If it has an alcohol content - I'll drink it!

[JWICE2]

The text looks a little unreadalbe in 800x600

[P]

*sigh*
Page is fairly screwed in 800*600. The tables don't line up, and the navlinks have been cut short so they're unreadable.
http://www.wireplay.co.uk/ubb/frown.gif

[DarkHalf]

erm, p, I MADE IT IN 800x600

and i know how to make a site, so why dont u make sure your in 800x600, eh. they do line up, but if your in gayscape (also know as netscape) it may not work. ps never end with a grimace

http://www.wireplay.co.uk/ubb/smile.gif

thanx the rest of yer, for you input.

[P]

I actually meant 1280*1024, don't know why I typed 800*600.

Yes I use Netscape. Wrt viewing your site with Netscape: Apart from looking messy (which is forgiveable) the nav links are unreadable (all I can see are the beige bars, and a tiny bit of the text, the rest has been cut short... so there's not enough to make sense of what it says). Taken that the background of the top and side bars is a flat blue (and the layout is very simple), it would not have been at all difficult to make the site fully compatible (and nigh on identical looking) in both of the major browsers. It's down to your incompetence as a web designer that this error is present, and not because browsers other than your chosen one are 'gay'. Taken that it was Netscape who (for want of a better word) 'invented' the mechanics (including cookies and javascript) that are an integral part of so many successful sites, then it's a bit rich to ignore their browser.

On a final note: don't ask for opinions if you're not open to criticism. Constructive criticism, like mine, is the easiest way of improving -by finding out what you could do better. In this case, you could improve the site a hundred fold by tweaking your code so that it works perfectly for Netscape and IE users.

[S8N]

right on p.

do you have your own web design company by any chance? i need to ask you summet.

l8r.

www.craigkelly.co.uk (http://www.craigkelly.co.uk)
s8n@thedoghousemail.com

[Ricardo]

Like the layout, viewed fine at 1600x1200 in full screen mode (F11 in IE5).

Top banner bar could do with a bit of tweaking, taking off about 8 pixels from the right hand side so it lines up with the righthand navi bar.

Ricardo

------------------
richh@realmail.co.uk

I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather... not screaming in terror like his passengers.

[DarkHalf]

Yeahh ricardo i was considering that, but it didnt look right, maybe i should just get more of em. hmmmm mmm

S8, yeah, mail me at gimpdarkhalf@hotmail.com

(does ubb work?)