PDA

View Full Version : (we are the) Wireplay Web Masters


mr_grumpy_man
20-09-2000, 15:28
Sorry, cheesy name, but the best I could come up with.

http://www.stormloader.com/users/wpwm/

Come on then. Hit meh!

Oh, sorry 'bout the bl@@dy banner - I thought it was meant to be banner-less, and I can't be bothered to go through the hassle of sorting out something else at the moment. I'm gonna have the bath I ran three hours ago. :(

Karve
20-09-2000, 15:32
That is a very good idea...

mr_grumpy_man
20-09-2000, 15:38
Not mine :)

Gwil started a thread a while ago - that's where it's from. Gwil asked for a volunteer to take over the project when his machine died.

mr_grumpy_man
20-09-2000, 16:26
Ahhh... thats better. All nice and clean. Although my neck still hurts. Anyone got a cure for whiplash? I had a bit of a fall of my motorbike last night because of the rain (and my tires might need pumping up...), and my neck is killing me.

Anyway.

My thinking behind the site (which as I've siad before, was Gwil's suggestion, although I did have a similar idea but didn't have a phone line to suggest it :) ) is this.

While all that we (and this is *our* site, even if I'm the one working on it at the mo) need at a basic level is just a simple list of all our sites, I thought that, well, we could do better than that.

People spend a lot of time on this forum looking at a giving critique for other people's sites, so I thought why not make it a little more interesting, stick a little review in there, some suggestions and information about the site/maker etc.

So that's the direction I'm currently going. For those of you who're afraid my strong feelings about Flash will bias me towards flash-free sites, don't worry, I can be objective :) In any case, I encourage you to contribute. This is your/our site!

# If you have a site you'd like to feature, then mail me.
# If you disagree with a review, tell me.
# If you'd like to make a suggestion (about the site itself, or a site featured), mail me.
# If you have anything at all to say, mail me (no abuse please - it will be traced and reported to WP).

Basically, I'm looking for Sites to put on the list, reviews of sites to post (by other people, not the creator, obviously!), quick 'soundbites' about sites and I'd also like feedback from the site creators about reviews and comments. Also, I'd like to stick some 'features' on the site - columns basically. Expect to see a rant from me about flash shortly :)

I'll be looking for a couple of regular reviewers - there's quite a few of you with sites out there, and frankly I'd go loopy trying to politely tell you they're all pants. :P

So, the balls in your court. More stuff will appear on the site soon. I'll be contacting authors to get some more details or ask for a response as necessary.

Cheers, hope you all like it.

Gareth
mr_grumpy_man

p.s. on the other hand, if you want nothing to do with the site and your site is listed, mail me, and I shall remove all traces of it. And apologise. Well, maybe just remove all traces of it...

SPAWNO
20-09-2000, 17:24
lo

superb idea m8y.

i love it. espec. as my site is on it :)

wohoooo

if ya need a hand in any way drop me a line.

as for all you other peeps out there, get building those sites. us guys (and girlies) have talent, and we should show it to the world !!

heh :laugh:

Gwil Da Skank Of TA
20-09-2000, 19:07
Thanks grumpy, you is da man!!

Anyhow, nice work matey, dont forget to stick Gwily boys site on there :P

heheheh

Dahfish
20-09-2000, 21:12
howdy all, Grumpy... thats the story to throw ph33r into us bikers hearts... eek what bike and what state?

I like the idea of a review site for other peeps sites. Nice one ;)

DahFish.

Jeh
21-09-2000, 01:23
lo:)

http://www.q3consortium.co.uk

q3site for clans, clan members and non clanned q3 ppl etc, bits being added all the time, tbh tho half of it u cant see unless u are a member, and it is for q3 ppl only really, so apologies there if u dislike q3 in any way shape or form:).

mr_grumpy_man
21-09-2000, 11:22
I've moved the site to:

http://www.wpwm.fsnet.co.uk

It'll live there for a while - at least it's fast, reliable and ad-free! And it'll let me upload to it, unlike everything else I've tried :angry:

mr_grumpy_man
21-09-2000, 17:23
Updated the site. The site list is on now, a couple of tweaks.

And Gwil's site :)

I should be adding a couple more sites a day, although I'll only change the new/top site bits every now and again, so that it doesn't change every day :)

Please, if wanna comment on anything, then do so!

Gwil Da Skank Of TA
21-09-2000, 19:25
thanks grump, no wi have some ideas on where to optimise it....
this has helped a lot!!

thanks again matey :)

FirstDelta
22-09-2000, 05:18
Hi, cool site.

Just wondering if you could review my site, as its my first site i have made, so i need to see what peeps think of it. I know it contains flash and you dont like flash :( but i had to experiment with it.

thanks,

PS , i would e-mail you, but hotmail is down...damn microsoft!

My site is http://www.clan-zone.net/tar

cya.

2bad4u
22-09-2000, 09:29
Why isn't it in 800*600 or aru you planning to do another version?

Jamp30
22-09-2000, 19:37
mwuhahaha
i liked my sites review..

:D no need for me to say i disagree with it..
but thanks for the input :)


heres my views anyway (thanks again for the review)
the navigation bar was used to make the site look clean, fresh and uncluttered at a lower res.

If it was always there ... well it would look more like a mess..

not many graphics....mm... they wouldn't go really.. i take your point

2 1/2 mins to load! wow was my server having a bad day..
its only got about 50-60kb of graphics, so thats surprising
i think the server must have been real slow, take about 15seconds at most here..

[Edited by Jamp30 on 22-09-2000 at 07:45 PM]

martint
25-09-2000, 20:51
not too bad but i hate websites in which you have to scroll across. Sorry but someone had to say that.

mr_grumpy_man
25-09-2000, 23:54
Scroll across??? Ahhh... you must be one of those 800*600 rogues.

Sorry. To keep the format fixed, I've used pixel-sized table cells. Hence it screws up on anything less than 1024*768. There's another thread in this forum about screen resolutions - if I think there's enough demand, I'll see about doing a lower res version - but at the moment I don't have the time.