PDA

View Full Version : 3D MARK 2000 score pls look


Special Ops
29-09-2000, 14:09
I have a P3 500 at 500, 128 MB PC 100 RAM, MSI 6119 MB AGP x2 and a Prophet II GTS 32 MB DDR.

I get 4081 3D MARKS on default settings with 3dmark 2000.(1024*796 etc etc).

I am using the 5.22 Guillemont drivers, would using the det 3 6.18 help? or is this score fine?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Thorne
29-09-2000, 16:11
Id say that was OK!,I get 5300 with an Athlon 600,256mb ram and geforce 2 GTS.Only worry if you have less than 2000 m8 :)

Oh thats with the 6.26 drivers BTW

Deathwish2000
29-09-2000, 17:20
errrrrrrrrrr, WTH!?

i get 4241 on my system, p3 500@560, 128mb ram, Voodoo5 5500 @ 183mhz, Sb Live 1024

embattle
29-09-2000, 17:38
Originally posted by Deathwish2000
errrrrrrrrrr, WTH!?

i get 4241 on my system, p3 500@560, 128mb ram, Voodoo5 5500 @ 183mhz, Sb Live 1024

....and?

Deathwish2000
29-09-2000, 18:56
well i thought that the GTS 0wn'z 3dMark? doesn't seem to :)

embattle
29-09-2000, 18:58
You do have extra Mhz in your processor.

Special Ops
29-09-2000, 20:20
I think my 3dmark score is ok its now 4152 and its in the percentage bounds of working out scores with other processors.

The only prob is that halflife runs like ****, It always drops below 25 fps and I dont know why. I had a voodoo3 3000 before this and used minigl on HL so I dont know if thats the cause.

Could someone tell me what they get on timedemo 1 on Q3 with a Geforce2 with defaul settings on q3. I.e settings just after you install. Thanks.

Deathwish2000
29-09-2000, 23:08
Originally posted by embattle
You do have extra Mhz in your processor.

point taken :)

Troggy
29-09-2000, 23:51
P3 500 128meg Intel Se440bx-2 m/b GTS2 64meg 3d mark 4180

So what does it all mean ?

Captain Peac0ck
30-09-2000, 18:42
My score on a celeron 400 mhz,128 mb ram,voodoo 3 2000 pci,
is a crappy "1301",is it my processor thats letting me down?
:bigcry:

embattle
30-09-2000, 21:32
Pro and gfx. 3DMARK seems to favour Nvidia cards.

Troggy
30-09-2000, 21:44
My score before on an ATI Rage 125 was 1500

And I don't think 3d mark favours Nvidia

Deathwish2000
30-09-2000, 22:56
3dmark favours NVidia, prbably right, but lets wait for 3DMark2001 when it is being developed for all current cards to give a more equal test bench.

Special Ops
01-10-2000, 00:41
I have a P3 500 at 500, 128 MB PC 100 RAM CAS 2, MSI 6119 MB AGP x2, Prophet II GTS 32 MB DDR (Using Det 3s 6.18 Drivers), DX7a installed, PCI 288 QD2 soundcard (Aztech came with pc).

In 3d Mark 2000 I get 4160 3d marks at the default benchmark, 1024x769 etc etc. That seems to be ok for my sys dosent it?

In q3 at normal settings, i.e fresh install I get 73 fps, this seems to be ok too does it not?

In halflife at 640 x 480 fresh install I get any where from 25 fps and below to 99fps (no action). It drops to 25 and below when there is action and sometimes even when there is no action (when I stand at certain areas of the map.

Now if I turn the res up to 1648 x ??? (cant mind exactly) the fps are the same Not lower but the same.

I cant understand this why is hl running so ****? It should be perfect.

Pls help me if you can, I think its a sound issue im not sure.

I am also not well and messing around with this aint making me feel better. Pls post 3d mark scores and q3 benchmarks and helpful info.

Before anyone suggests posting on other forums I have already and aint gotten much response.

Pls help me fellow gamers :)

Special Ops
01-10-2000, 20:29
Come on someone must have had simliar probs and found a solution?

Pls help :-(

Troggy
02-10-2000, 00:39
Special Ops my PC is the same spec as your's and I get the same results within a mark/fps or so, I have heard of other peeps on half life getting 25ish fps as the lowest on fairly high spec machines, so maybe that's the way it is, I do find putting the resolution down does not always improve the frame rate and play most games at 1024x768, I think 20fps is the minimum required for gameplay or is it really spoiling your game.

[Edited by Troggy on 02-10-2000 at 12:40 AM]

[BIZE]Duke[CL]
02-10-2000, 10:15
I only get 2300 with Athlon750 + Geforce 2 GTS :(
WTF is going on?!?!?

Dr_kazza
02-10-2000, 13:23
6252 - see my other thread for sys specs :P

puz
02-10-2000, 18:13
CPU Athlon 750 oc to 900
Geforce 2 GTS Prophet 2
Det 6.18

3dMark2000 = 6800
Quake 3 @ 1024x768x16 Full Detail = 175 fps

When I used 6.26 & 6.27 all these benchmarks died a death
I think they went down to around 4500 & 60 fps..

So Use the 6.18 as a start and work ya way up

Stevie C
03-10-2000, 08:27
These GTS's certainly seem to fly :)

I'm only on a GeForce DDR (Anni Pro)
I'm an Athlon 850 @961MHz
GeF was at 135/335
3DMark2000 = 5492

roll on NV20 ... pennies ready... I'll skip GTS

Steve

WildWayz
12-10-2000, 13:19
U wanna hear fooked up?

P3 667
QDI Advance 9 mobo
128mb PC133 Ram
Elsa Gladiac GeForce II GTS (32MB)
Windows 2000 SP1
Detonator 3 v6.34

I get a 3D Marks score of : 2888 at default benchmark.

If I oc my proccy to 720, I get 3128 in 3D Marks.

Bad, huh?

--James

Troggy
12-10-2000, 15:23
That's really slow man, you must be really pissed off !!!!

Hah Hah

OC it to 2ghrz

[Edited by Troggy on 12-10-2000 at 03:24 PM]

ZZEDD
12-10-2000, 16:31
wanna know crap I have a Soyo 5ema+ mobo, 128 smegs and a AMD K62 550 and a Geforce 2 MX and I get............











.....890?????? what's up with that then, but then again HL runs like a dream....

[Edited by ZZEDD on 12-10-2000 at 04:35 PM]

[KoTR]WIIIJA*
12-10-2000, 17:54
Nvidia do not "own" 3Dmark infact quite the opposite!!!


detonator drivers are renowned for handling D3D very badly atm especially the newest driver releases,they defo perform open GL exceptionally well though.

Athlon classic 750@1076
3D ProphetII gts 32mb@220core~360mem
Detonators 6.34/DX7a

3D mark default benchmark of 7154

Q3 Timedemo 1,picmip2,lightmap,16bit(other settings off)250-260Fps :)

Also 3D mark is only a benchmark and also favours intel chips,just visit zoiah messageboards and u will see how much better Intel chips perform in 3Dmark,but when it comes to "real" games its a different story altogether.


Regards


WiiijA

cem
13-10-2000, 10:02
Q3 Timedemo 1,picmip2,lightmap,16bit(other settings off)250-260Fps

in what res 640x480? and other settings off.. try it 1024x32bit with everything on gibs crosshair cg_drawgun the lot, cause i just wondering thats all :)

[KoTR]WIIIJA*
14-10-2000, 16:22
Thats in 800x600 m8,give me time and I'll try with all on :)

thought i would reinstall drivers to see if thats what was giving me "fairly" low 3Dmark scores and it worked:)

Here is my bios and card settings

Bios:
Agp aperture 128mb
Fast writes Disabled
All shadowing disabled

Card:Det 6.34 drivers
D3D:
Enable fog table emulation
Adjust Z buffer depth to rendering depth if unequal

Mipmapping detail:best performance
texture alignment:centre (value 0)
V-synch:always off
No antialiasing

OpenGL:
Enable buffer region extension
Allow the dual plane extension to use local vid mem
Use fast linear-mipmap-linear filtering
Default color depth for textures(16bpp)
V-synch:always off
No antialiasing

Hardware:
220core~360 mem


Scored 7969 3Dmarks on default benchmark :)

gonna tinker and try and hit 8000 I reckon


regards

WiiijA

arian
17-10-2000, 03:08
P3 600E OC to 800
Abit Be6-2 Mobo
256 Mb Mem PC133
Geforce 2 GTS

3 D Mark Win 98SE 6600

3 D Mark Win2k 3500

Er why ??

Both using Det 6.18

One or two games have started to make me feel ill lately is this anything to do with it ??

WildWayz
17-10-2000, 13:22
Aaaaah

I got a Soyo SY 7something and installed Win98SE

Got 5882 now :)

And Win2K has crap Direct3D Support, hence the low score.

--WildWayz