20 player server?

[Mad Ad]

Across the games i see on the net, many seem to be 20 player minimum.

RTCW maps are larger than some games, and 8 a side can be a bit desolate. Do you guys think that the WP server would be more popular as a 20 player?

[[tR] Ice-Man]

20 a-side would be alot of fun!!

e-mail razz and ask him about it!! razz@wireplay.co.uk

[Slam]

I think he meant 10 a side Ice-Man.

I'd vote for a 20 player server, although would adding an extra 2 people per side really make that big a difference to the gameplay?

[Legion]

RAH!
Lets get a couple of 64 player servers...

32 a side OWNS!!! (except the whole reinforcments thing gets a bit cramped)

[Kafka]

32 a side is cool, especially on the bigger maps (depot *needs* a lot of players to be good). But the spawn rooms are so cramped that it'd be chaos in practice.

I've been in games where the axis spawn room gets so congested that some players start tk'ing in frustration, and this sets off a negative chain reaction, affecting the whole game.

I wouldn't want this on WP servers, personally. I'm hoping that the maps will be tweaked by Gray Matter in a future update.

[Mad Ad]

agreed, atm a range between 20 and 32 seems best.

Im more thinking of it being a server that net ppl will join as well as WP, rather than better gameplay. I dont mind joining a half full server, but an empty one is no fun :(

[[tR] Ice-Man]

aaahhhhhhhhhhh right got the wrong end of the stick :)

[Razz]

I've increased the server limit to 24 for the time being... let me know what you think of it :)

[Mad Ad]

TY razz :)


Next thing is sorting out a decent cycle - the maps/games are so confusing in general, objective maps on stopwatch, checkpoint maps from objectives, plus some great new customs (bk_forest, omg, i love it) as well as some bum ones